Lecture Note
University
California State UniversityCourse
PSY 150 | Introduction to PsychologyPages
1
Academic year
2023
Jithin Jacob Issac
Views
0
p {margin: 0; padding: 0;} .ft00{font-size:21px;font-family:NimbusSansBold;color:#000000;} .ft01{font-size:18px;font-family:NimbusSansBold;color:#000000;} .ft02{font-size:15px;font-family:OpenSymbol;color:#000000;} .ft03{font-size:18px;font-family:NimbusSans;color:#000000;} .ft04{font-size:18px;line-height:23px;font-family:NimbusSans;color:#000000;} MARX'S CRITIQUE OF MORALITY AND ALIENATION Historical Materialism Views history as eras defined by economic production and class control Dominant class maintains power and shapes culture to its advantage Morality merely reflects and reinforces interests of ruling class Rejects Morality as Ideology Morality interprets and regulates behavior to support social order Serves interests of dominant class, not universal interests Workers lack self-transparency about their motives Alienation of Wage Labor Work should provide identity, recognition, self-realization But wage labor leads to alienation from: Product of work Process of work Human capacities Other people Overcoming Alienation Workers must control means of production Allows work to fulfill communal aspirations and identity Differs only in degree from more modest organizational reforms Critique Observations of importance of meaningful work supported As is characterization of stultifying industrial work conditions Recognition of need for political action beyond individual ethics In summary, Marx offered a materialist critique of morality as ideology, andcompelling insights into alienation at work and the need for systemic political change,despite the failures of communism. His analysis remains relevant.
Marx's Critique of Morality and Alienation
Please or to post comments