Lecture Note
University
California State UniversityCourse
PSY 150 | Introduction to PsychologyPages
2
Academic year
2023
Jithin Jacob Issac
Views
0
CONTEMPORARY CONTRACTARIANISM AND HEGEL'S SOCIAL ETHICS Rawls' Theory of Justice Uses social contract to express moral equality, not artificial obligations Principles of justice must be agreed to freely and equally Veil of ignorance ensures impartial consideration of principles Aims for fairness, impartiality, universalism based on autonomy Power Differentials Undermine Contracts Example: mandatory arbitration clauses in employment Limits access to courts, due process, class actions Favors repeat employer users over individual employees Hegel's Social Self-Realization Humans achieve self-realization through social engagement Ethics concerns interpersonal relationships of trust, loyalty Social relations intrinsic to self-identity, not peripheral But must be with worthy people, organizations, institutions Developing a Social Self Starts with undifferentiated self-consciousness Interacting with objects develops sense of personal freedom Exchanging property involves norms of right and wrong Generalized morality recognizes shared identity with others Welfare becomes universalized Duty Defined by Social Institutions Rejected Kant's abstract moral law and subjective conscience Claimed only objective ethics are laws and duties of institutions Assumes institutions are ethical and compatible with members Identification with duties makes them non-coercive
In summary, Rawls updated social contract theory to focus on impartial, fairprinciples of justice, while Hegel saw the development of a social self andidentification with institutions as key to realizing an ethical life. Both emphasize thefundamental social context of morality.
CONTEMPORARY CONTRACTARIANISM AND HEGEL'S SOCIAL ETHICS
Please or to post comments